Our EOT Dispute Service
EOT Disputes
Implementing an EOT introduces several legal complexities for business owners.
These disputes can arise due to the transition from traditional ownership to employee ownership, impacting various stakeholders.
A key challenge is managing potential conflicts of interest among the parties involved in the ownership transition phase.
For instance, a founder serving as a trustee may face competing priorities. This dual role often causes potential conflicts that can be challenging to manage without clear legal guidance.
Furthermore, disagreements can occur regarding the valuation of the share capital of the company being sold to the EOT, requiring precise legal frameworks to align everyone's goals.
Trustees must take all reasonable steps to ensure the price paid for the shares does not exceed market value, any interest on a deferred element of the purchase price does not exceed a reasonable commercial rate, and that an independent valuation is obtained and relied upon.
Governance must preserve the EOT’s controlling interest (in shares, votes, profits, and assets) and prevent any agreement that might cause a loss of control without trustee consent.
Who we help
We act for EOT trustees (corporate and individual), the company board, founder sellers, shareholders, employee councils and other parties involved in the sale.
We can help where:
- The trust deed or sale contracts are unclear or need re-interpreting.
- A founder or director is also a trustee, and a clear conflict of interest policy is needed.
- Disputes arise over the business valuation, deferred payments, or financial performance targets.
Our team provides legal strategies specifically designed to manage EOT disputes and maintain business operations – protecting the underlying business.
Why choose Myerson after an EOT sale?
- Our legal experts have a wealth of experience in navigating complex EOT claims to secure the best outcome.
- As an employee-owned company ourselves, we understand how an EOT works in practice.
- We have a cross-disciplinary legal team: corporate, dispute resolution, and employment aligned around your business plan to avoid delays and disputes.
- For the past seven years, the Legal 500 has rated us as a Top Tier legal firm.
- We offer a partner-led service to make sure you get the greatest legal counsel and support with a focus on business.
- All of our clients receive free newsletters and webinars that keep them informed about dispute resolution legal developments.
- Check out the Myerson Promise for more information on the benefits of working with us.
Some Example Scenarios (Post-Completion)
- Trustee & Board Information: The trustee requires Management Information (MI) to fulfil its duties, but the company is concerned about sharing sensitive data. We create a practical information-sharing protocol that protects the business whilst satisfying the trustee's requirements. If necessary, we will seek court intervention to force the board to comply with its obligations and share the requisite information.
- Senior Employee Exit: A departing senior employee's situation involves complex HR rules and contract terms. We help align all parties on the correct procedure according to the legal documents, aiming to resolve the matter before it escalates.
Employee Ownership Trust Disputes FAQs
Can a company director also be an EOT trustee?
Yes, this is common. However, it's essential to have a robust conflict of interest policy in place.
This includes clear steps for when a director must step aside from a decision to ensure they can balance their duties to the company with their legal duties to act in the best interests of the EOT and its beneficiaries (being the employees of the company owned by the EOT).
It is also important to ensure, when appointing the trustees, that the EOT maintains its independence from the selling shareholders (they must not form a majority of the trustees and cannot have control of the EOT).
Can the agreed EOT price be revisited if the business underperforms?
It is unlikely that the sale price may be challenged if it is fixed in the share sale agreement. However, where there is an earn-out, the sale agreement may provide a formal process for an independent expert to settle pricing disagreements (this is often referred to as an ‘expert determination’).
We can work with your nominated accountant in working through the expert determination process. This is separate to HMRC challenging the price paid if it feels that it was above market value – which would be in breach of the EOT rules / legislation and so risks prejudicing the tax advantages attached to the EOT structure.
When should a trustee seek court directions?
A trustee may seek guidance (or direction) from the court when they are uncertain about their duties or how to handle a particular issue. This formal process (by way of an application under Part 64 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998) provides clear guidance on how to proceed.
Crucially, it can also protect the trustee from being personally liable for legal costs (known as ‘Beddoe relief’). It represents a sensible step when the way forward may be unclear.
Good governance of the EOT (and the company) should help in giving trustees the right guidance and toolkit to enable the right decisions to be made. Trustees can also attend courses and training to help them in what canbe a challenging role at times.
Can reserved matters be changed after completion?
Yes, the list of key decisions requiring specific approval (‘reserved matters’) from the selling shareholders can be changed.
Any amendments must still comply with the wider terms of the original sale contract, the trust deed, and HMRC’s rules.
Most importantly, the core EOT conditions must always be met: the trust must keep a controlling interest in the company, all employees must continue to benefit equally and the selling shareholders should not exert control (directly or indirectly) over the trust.
In respect of the latter, it is normal for a selling shareholder who has deferred consideration due over a number of years, to have a right to veto material/fundamental matters relating to the company – however, this should not go beyond what is necessary and advice should be sought to ensure such matters do not breach the EOT rules.
How should ‘bad leaver’ cases be handled for employees or managers?
Follow the process in the relevant rules, the articles and the employment contract.
Document the reasons, apply the criteria consistently, and take legal advice before action to reduce unfairness/constructive dismissal risk.
What if a selling shareholder becomes a ‘bad leaver’?
Apply the sale agreement’s leaver provisions and payment mechanics.
We can assess the contractual triggers, the impact on deferred consideration, and any conflicts for trustee/directors, ensuring compliance with the EOT rules so that the trust’s control and tax treatment are not jeopardised.
Testimonials
Meet Our Dispute Resolution Team
Contact Our Experts
You can contact our lawyers below if you have any more questions or want more information: