Our Service

A company is limited to purchasing its own shares by using funds held in its distributable reserves, from monies raised from a fresh issue of shares or by using its own capital. If a company uses capital to purchase its own shares, there are further restrictions.

A share buy-back can be carried out between the company and any shareholder individually (and not necessarily in relation to all shareholders).

Similarly, a share capital reduction is a process governed by the Act which allows funds retained in the capital of a company to be returned to its shareholders. As the process involves reducing a company’s capital, the directors have greater duties to the company, its shareholders, creditors and other stakeholders to ensure that such a process does not affect the solvency of the company. Unlike a share buy-back, a share capital reduction will apply to all shareholders of a company.

Find out more below about when a company would wish to purchase its own shares or carry out a reduction of its shares, the process for each and the pitfalls you should look out for.

There are many reasons why a company would want to carry out a buy-back of its shares or a share capital reduction and each process has its advantages and disadvantages.

The main reasons for carrying out a purchase of own shares include:

  • To exit a shareholder from the company: the most common use for a buy-back is to allow for the purchase of an exiting shareholder’s shares. This may be because the continuing shareholders are unwilling to fund the exit themselves (as it will effectively be paid out of taxed income) or because the price for the shares is too expensive for the continuing shareholders to pay. This allows the continuing shareholders to maintain control of the company in the same proportions that they have without risking the exiting shareholder’s shares being offered to a third party;
  • To return cash to shareholders: companies that hold large amounts of cash whether from accruing retained profits or following the proceeds of sale from the disposal of an asset may want to divest some of it by returning capital to shareholders;
  • To operate an employee incentive scheme: a company that operates an employee share scheme may wish to facilitate the purchase by the company of an employee’s shares when they leave the employment of the company; or
  • To adjust the proportions in which shareholders hold shares: some shareholders may wish to realise part or all of their investment in shares while other shareholders may wish to increase their proportionate shareholding.

A reduction of share capital can be carried out for several reasons. These include:

  • Return surplus capital: if a company has surplus cash or assets it may pay/transfer it direct to its shareholders by cancelling the shares issued to such shareholders;
  • Creating distributable reserves: a company can be prevented from paying out dividends to shareholders where the company has accumulated realised losses, even if it is trading profitably. A reduction of share capital can be used to eliminate such losses and/or increase distributable reserves, enabling the payment of dividends which may be more tax effective to shareholders; or
  • Supporting a share buy-back or redemption: a company wishing to buy-back or redeem shares out of distributable profits may carry out a reduction of share capital to create sufficient distributable profits to carry out the process.

Reductions in share capital may also be used in conjunction with schemes of arrangement as a way of structuring mergers and acquisitions.


Are there any pitfalls to watch out for in a share buy-back?

The Taxation Trap

The selling shareholder’s tax position must be considered very carefully before proceeding with a buy-back. Monies paid by a company to an individual to buy-back his or her shares are generally treated as a payment of income unless the transaction is exempt (see below). As the buy-back is treated as income and not a capital payment, Entrepreneur’s Relief may not be available.  Tax advice should be sought on this position.

In order to ensure that the payment is treated as capital and not income (so that Entrepreneur’s Relief may be claimed), the transaction must qualify as an exempt distribution, the following conditions (some of which have complicated formulae and requirements) have to be met:

  • The company must be an unquoted trading company;
  • The purpose of the buy-back must be to benefit a trade carried on by the company or to discharge an inheritance tax liability on death to avoid causing undue hardship;
  • The selling shareholder must be resident in the UK and the shares must have been owned by him/her (or his/her spouse) for five years before the buy-back (or three years where the shareholder has died);
  • The interest and right to share in profits of the shareholder must be “substantially reduced”; and
  • Immediately after the sale, the shareholder must not be connected with the company.

Failure to follow the procedure correctly

Restrictions are imposed on companies buying back their shares under the Act in order to protect creditors. The procedure to effect a purchase of own shares must therefore be followed strictly. If the relevant part of the Act is contravened the transaction will be void and an offence will be committed by the company and every officer in default

Payment by instalments?

Exiting shareholders may need to sell all of their shares in one go to preserve their claim for Entrepreneur’s Relief or majority shareholders may seek to acquire all the shares of a minority shareholder in order to gain complete control of the company. However, the company may not have sufficient funds to purchase all of the shares at the agreed price in one transaction.

For this reason payment of the purchase price for the shares by instalments would be useful, however, under the Act the shares must be paid for at the time they are purchased (unless the buy-back is for the purposes of or pursuant to an employee share scheme). An alternative structure would need to be used (see below) if there are insufficient funds to buy-back all of the shares at the agreed price.

What are the alternatives to carrying out a buy-back?

This will depend on what the company and shareholders wish to achieve. If the company wants to return surplus cash to shareholders, it could consider declaring a special dividend or reducing its share capital (see below).

Determining which of these is most appropriate is likely to be dependent on the tax treatment of the relevant transaction.

If there is an exiting shareholder but there are insufficient funds to buy-back his shares at the relevant time, then there are several options:

  • Carrying out the share buy-back with multiple completions (essentially a series of separate buy-backs on different dates), however, each completion would be subject to the company having the necessary distributable reserves to purchase the shares on that date;
  • A partial buy-back with an option for the shareholder to require the company to buy the remaining shares on a future date, but again, each further transaction would be subject to the company having distributable reserves;
  • All of the shareholders in a company sell their shares in that company to a new holding company owned by the continuing shareholders (via a share exchange arrangement) with payments for an exiting shareholder’s shares to be paid over a period of time. It should however be noted that this option may attract additional stamp duty (as it may be payable on all of the shares being sold/purchased); or

There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these structures, each with differing tax treatments, depending on the particular circumstances.

How to carry out a share capital reduction

A company can reduce its share capital either through a solvency statement procedure or by way of a court approved procedure:

Solvency statement

The solvency statement procedure is the simplest option, however it is only available to private limited companies (not PLCs) and it cannot be used to reduce the company’s share capital to zero.

In brief, the solvency statement procedure involves:

  • A statement signed by all of the directors stating that the company is solvent. It is an offence to make this statement without having reasonable grounds to believe it is true. Usually directors will wish to review the last statutory accounts, most recent management accounts and any material changes since the date of the last management accounts. They may also consider seeking an opinion from the company’s auditors;
  • A special resolution passed by the shareholders of the company approving the share capital reduction; and
  • Filing the solvency statement, the special resolution, a statement of capital and a statement of compliance by the directors at Companies House within 15 days of the resolution being passed – the reduction in share capital takes effect on registration.

Court approved procedure

PLCs and private limited companies may carry out reductions of share capital using a court approved procedure. Contrary to a solvency statement procedure, a court approved procedure can be used to reduce a company’s share capital to zero, if required. However, as a PLC must have a minimum share capital of £50,000 of which one quarter of the nominal value and all of any premium must be paid up – any reduction below these levels can only be carried out if the company first re-registers as a private limited company or if the court specifically permits it.

The court approved procedure involves:

  • A special resolution of the company’s shareholders approving the reduction in capital;
  • An application to the court;
  • The confirmation by the court; and
  • Filing the court order and a statement of capital with Companies House – the reduction in share capital takes effect upon delivery or, if the court directs, registration.

The court will only approve a reduction of capital if the company’s creditors’ interests will not be damaged. This is usually achieved in one of the following ways:

  • Compiling a list of creditors who may object, advertising the proposed reduction and giving creditors the opportunity to object;
  • Obtaining the consent of all creditors;
  • Showing that the company has enough liquid assets to pay for the reduction in share capital and all amounts owed to creditors plus a margin of 10%;
  • Setting aside a blocked bank account with enough funds to cover creditors’ debts;
  • Obtaining a bank guarantee; or
  • Giving an undertaking that the company will not make a payment out of capital until all creditors have been repaid or have consented, or that the repayment will be made out of distributable reserves.

Contact Us

Our Approach & Our Experience

We provide practical, commercial and coherent advice and are able to deliver a complete service with support from our Property, Employment, Commercial, Dispute Resolution and Private Client teams.

Our ethos is to provide our clients with an alternative to the major regional and national firms by offering high quality legal advice from highly experienced, specialist solicitors, but on a much more cost-effective basis.

We work closely with our clients to ensure that we meet their expectations both in terms of their objectives for a particular piece of work and in relation to costs. As standard practice, we give our clients an estimate of the costs involved in undertaking any piece of work at the outset. We can then provide costs updates on a regular basis. In addition, where appropriate, we are happy to discuss other pricing models (for example, fixed fees) if that is helpful to you.

We have substantial experience in advising and implementing buy-back arrangements and liaising with tax advisers on such matters. Examples of such include:

  • Simple purchase of shares out of distributable profits and capital;
  • Purchase of shares in instalments (each tranche of shares being a separate completion or subject to put and/or call options) or with multiple completions;
  • Approval of a share purchase agreement already entered into by the company; and
  • The purchase of shares of another company by way of a share-for-share exchange (except in relation to one shareholder who was exiting and received deferred cash terms – thereby preventing a buy-back of shares as payment was not all on completion).

 

Contact Us

Our Promise & Core Values

Our Promise

The Myerson Promise - Our Partners, team of lawyers and support staff commit to giving our clients more.

.
To always give you clear, jargon-free advice.
.
To be completely transparent about our fees from the outset.
.
Progress every matter in an efficient and timely matter.

Our Core Values

Our core values are at the centre of everything we do.

.
We are always professional but ensure that we are friendly and approachable.
.
We are determined and enthusiastic about supporting our clients and our people.
.
We willingly take responsibility and can be relied on to be commercial, effective and efficient.

Meet Our Specialists

Home-grown or recruited from national, regional or City firms. Our specialists are experts in their fields and respected by their peers.

Mohammed Akeel Latif

Mohammed Akeel Latif

Akeel is a Partner and Head of the Corporate Commercial department at Myerson

Andrew Brown

Andrew Brown

Andrew is a Partner in our Corporate Commercial department

Carla Murray

Carla Murray

Carla is a Partner in our Corporate Commercial department

Scott Sands

Scott Sands

Scott is a Partner in our Corporate and Commercial department

Testimonials

Contact Us

Book your consultation using the below enquiry form, alternatively, you can call us on

0161-941-4000