Our Undue Influence and Fraudulent Calumny in Wills Service
What is Undue Influence in a Will?
Undue influence occurs when someone applies such pressure or coercion that the testator's free will is overborne, leading them to make a Will they would not have made of their own accord. The Will may look valid on its face, but the decision-making behind it has been distorted.
The law does not treat all influence as "undue". It is natural and lawful to discuss a Will with family, and even to ask to be remembered in one.
The law only intervenes when influence crosses the line into coercion, whether overt (threats, bullying, intimidation) or more subtle (emotional blackmail, or exploiting someone's dependency).
The test is whether the resulting Will represents the testator's own wishes, or the influencer's wishes imposed on them. If a testator goes along with something simply to keep the peace or because resisting felt impossible, that can still amount to undue influence where the court is satisfied they felt they had no real choice.
Because everyone has the freedom to leave their estate as they wish, the standard of proof is high. Crucially, and unlike some lifetime transactions, there is no presumption of undue influence in a Will simply because of a close or seemingly suspicious relationship, it must be proved with specific evidence.
What is Fraudulent Calumny?
Fraudulent calumny is a distinct but related ground, sometimes described as "poisoning the testator's mind". It involves deliberately telling lies about another potential beneficiary in order to turn the testator against them and change how the estate is left.
For example, someone might falsely tell the testator that a child stole from them or abandoned them, knowing this is untrue, or not caring whether it is, so that the child is cut out of the Will.
To establish fraudulent calumny, a claimant usually needs to show a false representation about a beneficiary; that the person making it knew it was false or was reckless as to its truth; an intention to induce a change to the Will; and that the testator believed the falsehood and changed the Will because of it.
The focus here is dishonesty, not pressure. An honest opinion, even a harsh one, or a statement honestly believed to be true, will not normally amount to fraudulent calumny.
How Undue Influence and Fraudulent Calumny Differ
Both distort the testator's true intentions, but in different ways. Undue influence is about pressure and coercion; the testator signs the Will because they feel compelled.
Fraudulent calumny is about deception; the testator believes they are acting freely, but their decisions rest on lies. In undue influence claims, the court looks for evidence of control, intimidation or manipulation of a vulnerable testator; in fraudulent calumny claims, the court looks for false, targeted smears against a beneficiary. Both are serious allegations requiring careful, well-supported evidence.
These grounds are also separate from a challenge based on lack of testamentary capacity, which concerns whether the testator had the mental ability to make a Will. They are often raised together. If you are also concerned about the testator's mental state, see lack of testamentary capacity.
What To Do If You Suspect a Will Was Influenced
If you suspect undue influence or fraudulent calumny, act early.
Preserve any relevant correspondence, messages, diaries or notes the deceased made about their relationships and intentions, and note down potential witnesses who can speak to the testator's state of mind and dealings with the alleged influencer.
Do not alter or dispose of any original documents, as they may be needed as evidence.
Timing matters. Once probate has been granted and the estate distributed, a challenge becomes harder and more costly.
A common first step is to enter a caveat at the Probate Registry, which temporarily prevents a grant of probate from being issued and gives time to investigate.
There is no single short limitation period for a pure validity challenge, but delay can prejudice your position, and related claims, such as those under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 carry strict time limits (usually six months from the grant of representation).
Early advice is therefore essential.
When a Will May Be Challenged
Concerns commonly arise where the testator's true wishes appear to have been overridden or distorted.
Typical warning signs include:
- A dramatic, last-minute change to the Will, favouring a single person closely involved in the testator's care
- An unexplained exclusion of close family, particularly where relationships had been good
- One person isolating the testator and controlling access to them - screening calls or visits, or speaking for them
- The testator being suddenly dependent on one individual for care, finances or communication
- The testator expressing fear, anxiety or confusion about the person who benefits
- Unusual secrecy around the Will, such as a new Will prepared without the knowledge of long-standing advisers
No single factor proves anything on its own.
But taken together, and alongside other material such as medical records showing cognitive decline, or solicitor notes recording unusual behaviour, they can help build a picture of what happened.
When assessing these claims, the court considers the testator's vulnerability and dependency at the time the Will was made.
Their age, frailty, mental capacity, any bereavement, isolation, language barriers, and reliance on the alleged influencer are also considerations.
An independent testator who understood their affairs and gave clear instructions is less likely to have been unduly influenced; an elderly or unwell person dependent on a carer who stands to benefit may be at greater risk.
Undue Influence and Fraudulent Calumny FAQs
Can a Will be set aside for undue influence?
Yes. If the court is satisfied that a Will was brought about by undue influence or fraudulent calumny, it can declare it invalid. The estate is then administered under the last earlier valid Will, or under the intestacy rules if there is none.
How is undue influence in a Will proved?
The burden of proof lies on the person making the allegation, who must satisfy the court, on the balance of probabilities, that the Will does not reflect the testator's free wishes. While that is the usual civil standard, courts often observe that the more serious the allegation, the more cogent the evidence needed. Suspicion alone is not enough.
Direct evidence of threats, coercion or lies is rare - not least because the central witness, the testator, has died. Cases are therefore usually built on circumstantial evidence, including:
- Witness statements from family, friends, carers and professionals about the testator's behaviour, relationships and any signs of pressure
- Medical records and expert reports showing cognitive impairment, mental ill health or physical vulnerability
- Financial records suggesting control by the alleged influencer or unexplained transfers
- The circumstances in which the Will was prepared and executed - who was present, and who gave the instructions
- Communications such as letters, emails, texts and messages showing patterns of control, threats or false statements about other beneficiaries
In fraudulent calumny claims, particular emphasis falls on proving that specific allegations were false and that the person making them knew this or was reckless about it.
Earlier Wills and the drafting solicitor's attendance notes are often central. Previous Wills can show a consistent pattern of provision over many years and reveal how radical a final change was; if a long-favoured beneficiary is suddenly excluded without explanation, the court will ask why. Solicitor notes can show who gave instructions, whether the testator attended alone, and whether the solicitor had any concerns about capacity or influence.
What is the difference between undue influence and fraudulent calumny?
Undue influence relies on pressure or coercion; fraudulent calumny relies on deception. false statements made to turn the testator against another beneficiary. Both can invalidate a Will.
How long do I have to contest a Will?
There is no single deadline.
Challenges to a Will's validity (undue influence, lack of capacity, fraud) are not subject to the same strict short limitation periods as some other claims, but delay can harm your position. Inheritance Act claims, by contrast, are usually subject to a six-month limit from the grant of representation, so prompt advice is important.
What happens if the challenge succeeds?
The disputed Will is treated as if it never existed, and the estate passes under the last valid Will or the intestacy rules. The court also decides who bears the legal costs, which may be paid from the estate or by individual parties, depending on conduct and the reasons for the dispute.
Why Work With Our Contentious Probate, Wills and Trusts Team?
- We’ve been named Best Contentious Probate Team at the British Wills and Probate Awards 2025, recognising our legal expertise, courtroom skill, national reach, client care, and transparency.
- We have been ranked as a Top Tier law firm by the Legal 500 for the last seven years.
- We have been recognised by The Times and The Lawyer as a Top 200 UK law Firm.
- Price transparency - we provide our clients with clear cost advice at the outset with ongoing updates throughout the matter. Sometimes, we can pursue a contentious probate claim for you on a no win no fee basis.
- The contentious probate team is led by experienced Partner Helen Thompson, a member of STEP (the global professional association for practitioners who specialise in inheritance and succession planning) and has completed the Advanced Certificate in Trust Disputes.
- All our Contentious Probate solicitors are members of the highly accredited Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists ACTAPS.
- We have the largest team of contentious probate solicitors in the Northwest, ensuring you receive the best legal advice and support.
- We are a full-service law firm operating from a one-site office, which means our teams communicate effectively and efficiently, and our contentious probate lawyers can draw on support from other specialist lawyers, such as property, private client, agricultural, family, commercial and corporate lawyers.
- We use the latest technology to ensure that we are working as efficiently as possible and that geographical distance is no bar to us from providing you with excellent client service.
- Please take a look at the Myerson Promise for further benefits of working with us.
Testimonials
Ms Syme
Great level of expertise and scope in all areas.
Ms Jackson
Eleanor Clarke was on the ball, honest, clear and lucid.
Mr Davies
The team have shown me great empathy and compassion at a very difficult time in my life and hope for the future.
Ms Syder
When I first contacted Myerson for advice with regard to my situation, I found them to be professional, patient and informative. During the process, I did at times find myself emotionally overwhelmed and stressed; however, Jennifer and Katie went above and beyond to support me and guide me through the options, giving me time to evaluate everything. The whole Contentious Probate Team made me feel supported and confident in my inheritance claim. I can’t thank them enough.
Mr Borrett
Nicola Moulds has been very understanding of my situation, as have all the other people I have communicated with in Nicola’s team. I would have no hesitation in recommending them.
Mr Naylor
Fantastic firm - couldn’t recommend enough! Nicola and her associates worked so hard to achieve a big win for me on my grandfather's estate . The knowledge that they all have in their own areas astounded me, and they are all such genuine, lovely women .
Mr Morgan
I just wanted to thank you for your brilliant work on my case. I know it wasn't the easiest of cases and I wasn't the easiest of clients you've ever had. But I would like to thank Nicola and her team for their hard work. Also Stephanie was excellent. Please pass on my gratitude to her. I'm really grateful for what you did for me. I can now move on with my life thanks to you. You have my deepest respect.
Mr A
I honestly can say that in my absolute worst time Myerson came through like a light in absolute darkness. I spoke with few firms and nobody matched the compassion, professionalism and honesty that I desperately needed. Please, anyone who needs legal representation, you can’t get better than Myerson’s in my experience.
Mr. J.
Rebecca Blundell was excellent, she was highly professional, efficient and above all delivered the results.
Caron & Mike
We were completely overwhelmed by our situation that needed legal advice and representation. Our turmoil ceased swiftly once we spoke to Jennifer. She was supportive, kind and caring whilst remaining professional and "to the point". Her knowledge and advice reassured us and gave us confidence in her expertise. We appreciate her and her team and would have no problem recommending them to anyone.
Paul
I wanted to write and thank you and your team for everything you have done for me. Your understanding of my mental issues has been unquestionable, and the patience you and the team have shown throughout the whole case has been brilliant, even at my worst when I could barely string a sentence together. I will not hesitate to recommend you and your company at any opportunity I get. Truly a 5 star company with morals that are very rare nowadays.
Anne Bailey
Thank you so much Stephanie for listening to me today and being so kind and empathetic. I think I may have been naïve and too trusting. I have forwarded your information to my Son and Daughter. On a personal note can I thank you for your time and being so kind and understanding. We need more people like you in the World.
Hannah
Thank you for the effort and hard work Jennifer and everyone at Myerson have put into my case; I appreciate it’s been a long haul, and it just felt necessary to express that gratitude.
Amanda
Jennifer has been incredibly patient and supportive and has given good advice. After I believe I was badly advised by a previous legal representative. Highly recommended.
Edwin
I found Jennifer McGuiness to be very friendly and very knowledgeable and gave Sensible advice.
The British Wills and Probate Awards Judging Panel
Myerson demonstrated the highest standards of legal expertise, courtroom skill, national reach, client care, and transparency, proved through reported trials, directory praise, and client testimonials.
Legal 500, 2022
Myerson’s are the go-to firm for contentious trust & probate, exceptional knowledge and negotiating skills. Will fight your corner well and reasonably priced for the high level of service.
Legal 500, 2022
Helen Thompson is considered ‘a true companion‘ by her clients for her litigation work.
Legal 500, 2022
Helen Thompson is a true champion of her clients, working tirelessly for the right outcome for them. A real gem in the sector and deserves recognition in her field.
Legal 500, 2022
It’s the personal touch they offer, including their empathy for your individual case.
Legal 500, 2022
Helen Thompson and Stephanie Ewan lead the team and were always available at the critical times. This involved out of hours working as well as comprehensive management of the resolution.
Legal 500, 2022
Stephanie is very professional and patient. She will help you with any questions you may have.
Legal 500, 2024
Myerson have set themselves apart from most every contentious probate practice in the North West. There is an exceptional level of talent at almost every level. Myerson deal with matters that are often fraught with complexity and emotion in a highly diligent and sensitive manner. When Myerson instruct me as counsel, their instructions are concise and well prepared.
Legal 500, 2024
They are genuine specialists in this area, with many of the team having obtained or working towards full ACTAPS membership and have strength in depth. When they are on the other side of a matter we know that their client will be getting sensible, practical advice from a knowledgeable team. They are a top level firm in the North West in this area.
Legal 500, 2024
The Myerson contentious trusts and probate team is the go-to team in the North of England, in my view. All its members who I have dealt with are superb – no weak link.
Legal 500, 2022
Myerson has given constant support and works together with the client proactively to get the matter resolved successfully and cost-effectively.
Legal 500, 2022
Compared with other firms I have dealt with Myerson’s took a very direct route in achieving success on my behalf. I was frequently able to discuss an issue online with several members of the team whenever an unexpected situation arose.
Meet Our Contentious Probate Solicitors
Home-grown or recruited from national, regional or City firms. Our contentious probate lawyers are experts in their fields and respected by their peers.
Contact Our Experts
You can contact our lawyers below if you have any more questions or want more information:
0161 941 4000
Latest Myerson Contentious Probate News
Netflix's The Four Seasons: Who Inherits If a Divorce Isn't Finalised?
Viewers of Netflix’s The Four Seasons will have followed the emotional fallout of Nick’s sudden death and the complicated situation he leaves behind. The second season of the hit comedy-drama has been praised for its sharp, often poignant exploration of midlife relationships, where love, loss, and life changes collide in ways that are both funny...
Read Blog
Surrogacy and Succession: What the Longleat Trust Case Means for Modern Inheritance Disputes
A recent High Court decision involving the Longleat estate highlights an emerging challenge in trust and probate law: applying historic trust instruments to modern family structures, particularly those created through assisted reproduction and surrogacy. Although the case is rooted in aristocratic wealth, the legal principles are widely relevant...
Read Blog
When Silence Leads to Conflict: The Most Common Disputes We See After Someone Dies
The death of a loved one should mark a period of reflection and closure. However, for many families, a lack of clarity or communication may result in legal disputes after death. In this blog, our Probate Dispute Lawyers outline the most common contentious probate disputes we encounter and why they arise.
Read Blog
15
Partnership and Company Disputes in Probate: Risks and Resolution
A practical session on partnership and company disputes in probate, covering key risks, impacts on estates and approaches to resolution. Partnership and company disputes can add significant complexity to probate matters, particularly where business interests form part of an estate. This session provides a practical overview of the issues that can...
View Event
Informal Agreements and Probate Disputes: The Risk of Handshake Deals
Informal family arrangements and verbal promises are a common cause of probate disputes, particularly in farming families and family‑run businesses. While these “handshake deals” may feel fair and binding at the time they are made, they can lead to costly and emotionally charged inheritance disputes after death. Our Contentious Probate lawyers...
Read Blog
Caveats, Warnings and Removal: A Practical Guide for Probate Practitioners
In this practical post-event webinar, Myerson Solicitors explored the legal and procedural complexities surrounding caveats , warnings and their removal in probate disputes , offering practitioners clear guidance on navigating one of the most misunderstood areas of contentious probate practice. The session provided a practical examination of the...
Watch Webinar