It is important to ensure that a nuptial agreement remains fair and meets the needs of the parties. Therefore, it is prudent to review its terms if particular events happen or after certain periods of time have passed. If a nuptial agreement is not reviewed and significant changes in the parties' circumstances occur, the court is unlikely to uphold its terms in any later financial remedy proceedings.
Formulating a list to include every type of event that should result in a variation of the terms of a nuptial agreement is difficult, but the following possibilities are commonly accepted as triggering events:
- The birth of a child (unless this was specifically contemplated in the original agreement, and those terms continue to appear fair).
- The parties settling and having the matrimonial home in a jurisdiction outside England and Wales.
- A party's incapacity through chronic illness or disability.
- Bankruptcy.
- Other significant changes in financial circumstances such as:
- a party's loss of employment;
- significant loss of value in a business; and
- significant loss of value in an asset.
Implementing a review clause should reduce the possibility of the nuptial agreement being deemed unfair by the court in later financial remedy proceedings as it shows the parties have considered the change in circumstance, have renegotiated the original agreement accordingly and believe the varied agreement is fair. A review clause is particularly important in the case of a young couple who potentially have many life changes ahead.