Steering Through Uncertain Times - Key Points To Consider On ‘Force Majeure’ Clauses

Karam Bhatti's profile picture

Karam Bhatti - Solicitor

Published
Article reviewed by Richard Meehan .
4 minutes reading time

Steering Through Uncertain Times Key Points To Consider On Force Majeure Clauses

In the midst of worldwide uncertainties such as the US administration’s extensive new import tariffs, armed conflicts, increases in large-scale cyber-attacks, and natural calamities (which can disrupt even the most well-organised and prepared operators), businesses need to be fully alert to the legal mechanisms that can be utilised to mitigate the impact of such events.

One contractual provision that can play a vital role in such circumstances is a ‘force majeure’ clause - a provision that typically excuses the affected party from performing a contract following the occurrence of an event outside of its control that prevents or delays its performance.

It is therefore advisable that when reviewing and negotiating commercial contracts in an unpredictable financial and geopolitical setting, adequate attention is afforded to the force majeure clause to ensure that it is drafted appropriately, particularly for those organisations contracting within sectors that are more susceptible to sudden disruptions.

Our commercial lawyers explore how well-drafted force majeure clauses can help businesses navigate an increasingly unpredictable global landscape, providing practical insights into what to include and how to ensure these provisions offer real protection.

Contact Our Commercial Team

Building a resilient contract

A force majeure clause will not be implied into a contract in English law, and it is therefore imperative for parties whose obligations could be affected by circumstances beyond their control to push for the inclusion of such a clause, whilst also ensuring that it is adequately drafted offering and suitable level of protection.

The following are some key points to consider when drafting a force majeure clause:  

  1. Define covered events clearly. Use a non-exhaustive list that includes both traditional risks (e.g. acts of terrorism, war and embargoes) and emerging risks (e.g. pandemics, government-imposed shutdowns, cyber-attacks, climate events and tariffs and regulatory changes).
  2. Include notice requirements. Specify when and how notice must be given and what (if any) documentation may be required to invoke the clause.
  3. Mitigation obligations. From the perspective of the party who is less likely to be affected by a force majeure event, consider including an express provision requiring the affected party to mitigate the effects of the force majeure event on the performance of its obligations. A force majeure clause will commonly provide that it cannot be relied upon if the exercise of reasonable endeavours could avoid the effects of the relevant event.
  4. Consequences of a force majeure event. The clause should specify the consequences of triggering force majeure - this may include the suspension of obligations, extension of deadlines, or termination rights if the event persists for longer than a prescribed period.  In particular, the clause should make clear whether or not the corresponding obligations of the party not affected by the force majeure event (commonly the customer’s payment obligations) are also suspended during the period for which the force majeure event is in effect.

Sign Up For The Latest Commercial Law News

Building a resilient contract

Drafting with precision

In addition to the points mentioned above, it is important to bear in mind that courts generally apply a strict rule of interpretation in respect of force majeure clauses (meaning, for example, that if a specific event is not explicitly listed within the clause, it may not be accepted as force majeure).

In the recent case of RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024], the UK Supreme Court handed down a ruling on a force majeure clause reinforcing the importance of clear contract wording in force majeure situations.

The fundamental issue in this case was whether using reasonable endeavours to overcome a force majeure event required the affected party to accept a proposal by the other party for the contract to be performed in a way that was different from what the contractual terms strictly required but which would provide a practical commercial workaround solution to the effects of the force majeure event.

The contract required payments in US dollars, but US sanctions, treated in this case as a force majeure event, effectively prevented RTI (as the customer) from paying MUR Shipping in that currency.

RTI, therefore, offered to pay in euros and compensate MUR Shipping for the additional costs of converting euros to US dollars. 

MUR Shipping refused this proposal and relied upon the force majeure provision to suspend its supply obligations - the basic question considered by the courts was whether it had been entitled to do so, or whether RTI’s offer of an alternative solution meant that MUR Shipping could not rely on the benefit of the force majeure clause.

The Supreme Court eventually found in favour of MUR Shipping, stating that, while RTI’s proposed solution was logical, as the contract did not allow for flexibility over the currency of payments, MUR Shipping was not obliged to accept a different method of contractual performance in order to overcome the effects of the force majeure event.

Speak To Our Experts

Drafting with precision

What is not force majeure?

It is important to bear in mind that not all obstacles in contract performance will qualify as a force majeure event, and a court may refuse claims based on:

  1. Anticipated events. If an event was predictable, it is unlikely to qualify (e.g. laws or regulations known at the time of contracting - if a law existed or was in contemplation before the contract was signed, it is unlikely to be held to be a force majeure event).
  2. Economic difficulty. Increased costs or financial losses will generally not constitute force majeure and are likely to be better covered under a specific price review mechanism.

Contact Our Commercial Team

What is not force majeure

Contact Our Commercial Lawyers

Force majeure clauses are becoming increasingly important within commercial contracts and are heavily relied upon for the purposes of managing risk in the midst of an unpredictable and volatile environment.

If you require support negotiating, reviewing or enforcing force majeure clauses in your commercial contracts, please get in contact with our commercial lawyers, who will be happy to assist.

0161 941 4000

Karam Bhatti's profile picture

Karam Bhatti

Solicitor

Karam has experience acting as a Commercial solicitor. Karam regularly advises clients on drafting and negotiating commercial arrangement across a range of sectors including Technology, Intellectual Property and Data and Privacy.

About Karam Bhatti